All Work And No Play

That's not the new Ranger XP 900

September 2012 Powersport News

By Mark Bourbeau

Photos by Wayne Davis

The Bull Run Guest Ranch (www.bullrunguestranch.com/), aka, Rockpile Ranch, located a little south and west of Cascade, MT, (elevation 3,389 feet) was the scene of the crime.

Yeah, some people say "it's a crime" that part of our job involves accepting an invitation to show up at places like the Bull Run Guest Ranch and thoroughly test the 2013 Polaris ATV/UTV  early build models. Guilty as charged. And we don't even feel bad about it.

Our main focus this time around was centered on Polaris' new and improved equipment, more specifically the totally redesigned, full-size Ranger XP 900 EPS.

And while we are on the subject of new and improved, the 2013 Ranger 900 fits both bills with a claimed three years of 70,000 man (and woman) hours of labor to develop, build and finalize approximately 500 product improvements found on the vehicle. That includes everything from the 25 percent brighter headlights to the 30 percent increase in stator output and high capacity battery to the redesigned with more tie-down points cargo box/tailgate and most everything in between.

Probably the most notable change to this Ranger as far as we're concerned is the new ProStar 900 engine and the accompanying drive train. Those two features really left an impression on us. And once again, we say new because this powerplant and delivery system has a real job to do, somewhat unlike its cousin the RZR XP 900, which is all fun and no work. The Ranger XP 900 is both work and play. 

Polaris officials went to great lengths to explain that the Ranger's engine is not the same engine as the RZR's, with Chris Hurd, Polaris' project lead for engines, telling us the Ranger ProStar is tuned specifically for utility use. The RZR 900 offers up 88 hp and 60 ft. lbs. of torque whereas this Ranger is much lower at 60 hp and a slightly comparable 54 ft. lbs. of torque, all while delivering the same fuel economy as the 800 motor. This horsepower/torque difference was accomplished by means of a different cam shaft, combustion chambers, engine management and fuel systems. The redesigned wet sump ProStar is also built with a new rod design and a cooling system for the valve train and is relocated more rearward in the chassis, to assist with heat and noise issues. The decibels get a double whammy with the new exhaust system that very quiet on this 2013 Ranger.

"This is a very different engine," Hurd said of the Ranger's ProStar powerplant. "One (ProStar) is designed for horsepower-the RZR-and one is designed for torque-the Ranger." In fact Hurd compared the engines in a way everyone can get their head around. "It's like a Corvette vs. a pickup," he said. "Both have a V8 but are designed for different use."

Polaris engineers mated this "torquer" of an engine with a 10.6:1 compression ratio to the transmission via a solid mount, then in to a clutch compartment with a new compound drive belt and a dramatically improved cooling system for the clutches and belt to perform more efficiently, especially under extreme heat and payloads. The end result is, you guessed it, more power to turn those wheels, so much more that Polaris claims more power to the ground with this 60 hp motor than a competitor's 70 hp motor. Hurd explained that the system is designed to give the maximum amount of torque down low. For example, 80 percent of the torque is delivered at 2800 rpm while 90 percent is delivered at 4800 rpm.

We didn't really get the opportunity to throw some weight on or behind this 900 and feel that experience from the driver seat due to slick mud during our test rides, but there was an impressive demonstration the first evening on extremely dry soil that had the consistency of flour on top, which didn't offer much traction either. The Ranger 900 pulled a dead-in-the-water 2-ton dump truck from a dead stop straight up approximately a 15 to 20 degree incline, gaining speed as it went further up the hill with the dust a flyin'. We're guessing Polaris may have exceeded the max rated towing capacity on that demonstration. It was impressive none-the-less.

After that demonstration, Ma Nature kicked up a fuss, throwing 90 plus mph winds our direction, followed by a steady, cold rain much of the night and past noon on our ride/drive day, creating extremely sloppy conditions. We came to ride, though, and a little rain wasn't going to stop us. Of course, it didn't hurt that the Ranger 900 was equipped with a flush-mount Lock&Ride Pro-Fit cab system.

We headed out into the clouds and rain that had settled in on the mountains of this 13,000 acre working cattle ranch and had a real blast covering as much territory as we could in one day. Obviously, real power testing was out of the picture at this point but throttle response and power delivery were very smooth and immediate whenever and wherever on the fairly diverse Rockpile trail system. As our test mule accommodated us with a relatively positive feel and smooth ride, we were able to see the "double nickel" on the speedo and then back out for safety reasons down on the lower trails showing us that this package has some swat up on the top side also, backing up the dead dump truck pull, confirming the low end grunt.

The positive feel and relatively smooth ride we experienced throughout our test drive are compliments of a new stiffer chassis delivering 100 percent more torsional strength while supporting a five-inch longer wheelbase compared to its predecessor, sprung on a proven suspension package upgraded with one more inch or 10 percent of travel. There is also 12 inches of ground clearance. One inch is marginal yet the extended suspension travel helped keep us from banging off of most of the boulders in the creek crossings and from high-centering on the unique cattle/horse proof fence crossings, which also lent testimony to the chassis rigidity as we literally had to bounce over the tops of the crossings.

We did experience a popping noise in the upper cage area associated with the Pro-Fit cab system that one engineer assured us was inherent to these early run models and already had been addressed for the "production" runs.

A lot of the Rockpile UTV and ATV trails were just wide enough to accommodate the side-by-side machines and in some places, if you slid off the trail, it was a long way to the bottom. Several hours of steady rainfall made the trails all slicked up, somewhat like a greased pig, making for some white knuckle travel on some of the side hill cuts. We felt relatively comfortable at most times working a brisk pace with the feedback from the chassis/suspension and associate some of these positive traits to the specked Maxxis tires that performed and cleaned themselves well in the challenging, low-to-no traction conditions in most of the areas we drove. Now, throw in the helping hand known as EPS for those slow speed tight maneuvers around the trees and boulders, not to mention the fly swatting episodes on the greased out trails, and we were livin' large and lovin' every minute of keeping control.

While we didn't have to do any chores with the Ranger XP 900 we tested, we do think this workhorse of a Cadillac in the UTV world might just make chores and other work much more pleasurable and mostly fun.

We have only touched on the main components of this full sized Polaris as there is laundry list of creature comforts and working accessories standard with the XP package. Then toss in the available options for the Ranger and the possibilities cover a wide spectrum. As we left the Rockpile, our thoughts were that the 2013 Polaris Ranger XP 900 EPS could very well be the latest and greatest ultimate blend of work and pleasure, raising the bar for all competitors to prove otherwise.

2013 Polaris Ranger XP 900 EPS

ENGINE

Engine Type 4-Stroke Twin Cylinder

Displacement 875cc

Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection

Cooling Liquid

DRIVETRAIN

Transmission/Final Drive Automatic PVT H/L/N/R/P; Shaft

Drive System On-Demand True AWD/2WD/ VersaTrac Turf Mode

Engine Braking System/Active Descent Control Not Equipped

SUSPENSION

Front Suspension Dual A-Arm 10 in. (25.4 cm) Travel

Rear Suspension Dual A-Arm, IRS 10 in. (25.4 cm) Travel

BRAKES

Front/Rear Brakes 4-Wheel Hydraulic Disc with Dual-Bore Front Calipers

Parking Brake Park In-Transmission

TIRES/WHEELS

Front Tires 25 x 10-12; 489

Rear Tires 25 x 11-12; 489

Wheels Stamped Steel

DIMENSIONS/CAPACITIES

Wheelbase 81 in. (206cm)

Dry Weight 1,360 lb (618 kg)

Overall Vehicle Size (LxWxH) 116.5x60x76 in. (296 x 152 x 193 cm)

Ground Clearance 12 in. (30.5 cm)

Seat Height N.A.

Fuel Capacity 10 gal (37.9 L)

Bed Box Dimensions (L x W x H) 36.5x54x11.5 in. (93 x 137 x 29 cm)

Front/Rear Rack or Box Capacity N.A./1,000 lb (453.6 kg)

Payload Capacity 1,500 lb (680.4 kg)

Hitch Towing Rating 2,000 lb (907.2 kg)

Unbraked Trailer Towing Capacity N.A.

Hitch/Type Standard/2 in. Receiver

FEATURES

Cargo System Lock & Ride

Lighting 55W low/60W high, LED Tail

Electronic Power Steering Available

Instrumentation Digital Gauge, Speedometer, Odometer, Tachometer, Tripmeter, Hour Meter, Clock, Gear Indicator, Fuel Gauge, Hi-Temp/Low-Batt Lights, DC Outlets (2)

  • Like what you read?

    Want to know when we have important news, updates or interviews?

  • Join our newsletter today!

    Sign Up
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Share

Send to your friends!

Already a subscriber? Please check your email for the latest full issue link.